Herding Cats, uh, Cardholders

Every Commercial Card program has at least one challenging cardholder. I’m willing to bet, though, that this statement is conservative. What can make cardholder management so difficult at times? For one, it is an interesting dynamic when you need people to follow policies and procedures, but you are not their manager. Several years ago, I heard Julie Miguel, CPCP, Purchasing Card administrator, Tension Corporation, use the phrase “herding cats” in relation to cardholders. Her good insight is shared below, in addition to tips from Jennifer Hart Barb, program administrator, James Madison University. The advice is grouped into four broad recommendations, including: 1) review your program structure for best practices, 2) consider the cardholders, 3) utilize effective communication, and 4) determine what you can control.   

Review Your Program Structure

Are aspects of your program helping or hurting your cardholder management efforts? For example:

Jennifer Hart Barb stresses, “Management needs to agree, in advance, that they are willing to apply consequences even if a cardholder is good at their ‘real’ job.”

Consider the Cardholders 

Jennifer provides a good reminder that most cardholders are not “fiscal people” and their minds may not work like yours. Try to understand cardholders’ core jobs and anticipate potential challenges. One example is a Facilities Maintenance team whose focus is on the building. Because they are not typically sitting at computers, reconciling transactions can be challenging. One possible solution is assigning a proxy to do the task for them. She has also had success in:

  • conducting a separate, in-person training session for one department to increase their comfort level
  • doing weekly audits to give cardholders timely feedback and help prevent the same mistake multiple times within a cycle

Julie Miguel has found it beneficial to identify the recurring situations that generate the most headaches and the characteristics of the cardholders who typically cause these situations. From there, she developed different approaches, including vigilance and clear communication (e.g., reports to managers, emails to cardholders), which leads to the next point.

Utilize Effective Communication

Your communication efforts can go a long way toward working with cardholders. Jennifer recommends being consistent in your answers and says, “If you encounter an argumentative cardholder, avoid engaging in a back-and-forth debate. Ensure there are documented policies and procedures to support your stance.” She acknowledges that it’s easy to jump to conclusions when dealing with a “problematic” cardholder, which is why consistency is so important. Using template emails is one solution.

If managing cardholders feels a bit like herding cats, then examine your program more closely to identify any contributing factors.

If managing cardholders feels a bit like herding cats, then examine your program more closely to identify any contributing factors.

Adding to what Jennifer and Julie suggest, I formed good relationships with cardholders by doing the following.

  • Be accessible. Per a previous blog post on adding a human touch to program management, take advantage of opportunities to simply say hello to cardholders and ask how things are going.  
  • Be an ally. Acknowledge you are both in the same boat in having to uphold organization rules. Neither of you might agree with some rules, so take the approach that you are trying to help them comply. 

Determine What You Can Control

Should some rules be changed? If so, are you authorized to do so? Julie described to me how one cardholder’s tardiness with reconciling used to hold up the entire accounting process. This drove them to adopt default accounting codes that allow the process to occur on time, forcing the cardholder and their department to correct any coding mistakes.

However, some things might be rooted in corporate culture that executives are unwilling to change. Julie concedes, “My program is not perfect, but it is not within my power to make it perfect.” She also admits, “Since I have managed the program from the beginning and have an emotional attachment to it, I would take cardholder misbehavior as a personal affront. I’ve had to work at moderating my responses. It also helps to maintain a sense of humor.” I agree! 

See more about P-Card program management.


About the Author

Blog post author Lynn Larson, CPCP, is the founder of Recharged Education. With 20 years of Commercial Card experience, her mission is to make industry education readily accessible to all. Learn more

Subscribe to the Blog

Receive notice of new blog posts.

8 Questions to Help You Rate Your Card Provider

How would you describe your organization’s relationship with its Commercial Card provider? I have asked this question of end-users in the past and received diverse responses ranging from frustrated venting to glowing reports. Wherever you are at, a stellar relationship with the card provider is an important part of achieving and maintaining program success, while a poor relationship can drag it down. If you already have a service level agreement (SLA) with your provider, ensure you are using it regularly to evaluate their performance. Either way, following are questions to help you identify what is working well and what needs improvement.

Evaluation Questions 

Does your card provider:

  1. Express interest and a willingness to be an active part of your program? For example, are they willing to come onsite to meet with management, demonstrate technology, etc.?

  2. Return/acknowledge calls and emails in a timely manner (e.g., within a day or two)?

  3. Take appropriate action to resolve issues and get answers?

  4. Listen to what you say? For instance, listening attentively to learn more about your unique needs.

  5. Proactively communicate about upcoming changes that affect you, current issues, industry trends, etc.?

  6. Inform you about technology features and reports that could benefit your program?

  7. Suggest ways to make your program and payment strategy stronger?

  8. Offer program reviews and supplier on-boarding services?

What are your biggest frustrations? Schedule time with them to discuss your evaluation. They cannot fix something if they don’t know it is broken. Any such meetings should result in a clear action plan to which both parties agree.

To increase your chances of getting a high level of service from your card provider, begin by being a good customer.

To increase your chances of getting a high level of service from your card provider, begin by being a good customer.

Are You a Good Customer?

Even if your card provider has room for improvement in the customer service category, the other piece of the equation is your organization. Consider the following questions to determine how you rate as a customer.

Does your organization:

  • Have realistic expectations of the provider?

  • Clearly communicate any concerns?

  • Return calls and emails in a timely manner?

  • Take advantage of the offered technology, including self-service features?

  • Ask the provider how you can be a better customer?

A good provider/end-user relationship pays off. See a related blog post about a common card provider frustration. In the end, though, sometimes an organization just does not mesh well with a particular provider representative. You might need to try to a new/different relationship manager before you give up on the provider entirely. 

See also information about the request for proposal (RFP) process. If you plan to attend the NAPCP Commercial Card and Payment Conference next month, maximize your experience by meeting different providers.  


About the Author

Blog post author Lynn Larson, CPCP, is the founder of Recharged Education. With 20 years of Commercial Card experience, her mission is to make industry education readily accessible to all. Learn more

Subscribe to the Blog

Receive notice of new blog posts.

The Payments Iceberg: Innovation and Realities

In the 1970s, anthropologist Edward Hall developed the iceberg model of culture to express how visible aspects like fine arts are dwarfed by what is hidden below the surface (e.g., relationships, attitudes, approaches). The concept could be applied to the payments industry as well. This month, while at the Cards and Payments on Campus Conference by PDG, I attended sessions about emerging technology that dazzle the mind and represent the tip of the iceberg. There are lots of great things happening. Yet, I also encountered—as I do every time I am at an event—challenges that have plagued end-user organizations for decades. It’s the reality that sits solidly under water. As a result, I have formed three conclusions, as outlined below. Take a look and see what you think. I welcome comments and always enjoy hearing different perspectives.

Three Conclusions

  1. Innovation has multiple personalities.

  2. Gaps between different entities keep getting bigger.

  3. Payments do not always make the priority list.

The Multiple Personalities of Innovation

At the conference, Matt Dill of Visa addressed the future of payments. Some advancements, like Amazon Go (“a new kind of store with no checkout required”), perfectly illustrate how innovation can be baffling, appealing, and necessary all at once. We may not always understand how something works, but we think it is cool. The practical, necessary side of innovation include factors like payment convenience and security. Payments have to seamlessly mesh with our ever-expanding, technology-driven world. Innovation will continue. It’s exciting.

Widening Gaps

I heard attendees ooh and aah over what Matt showed. Then, during Q&A at the end, some questions pertained to longstanding struggles end-user organizations have (e.g., trying to pay remotely for the hotel stay of a traveling employee and hotels requiring a copy/photo of the card). Throughout the conference, end-users shared the same types of challenges that I heard 15 years ago.

On one hand, technology is soaring. On the other hand, some organizations have not changed anything about their payment strategy in decades. Providers have solutions for common challenges, but some organizations are not pursuing them. The gaps are widening, which leads to the last point.

Payments Do Not Always Make the Priority List

In many cases, executives within end-user organizations have too many initiatives to manage and sales goals to meet. No one has time to address something if it is not absolutely broken, so B2B checks remain. Checks are costly and inefficient, but, as some execs would argue, they get the job done. 

Real, across-the-board change will not occur within the end-user community until there is an overhaul of decision makers. We need more leaders who: 1) embrace payments innovation at a consumer level, and 2) see the value in similarly aligning B2B payments. Finally, the decision makers need to be at industry conferences to see what is possible. 

See more about payment strategies.


About the Author

Blog post author Lynn Larson, CPCP, is the founder of Recharged Education. With 20 years of Commercial Card experience, her mission is to make industry education readily accessible to all. Learn more

Subscribe to the Blog

Receive notice of new blog posts.