U.S. regulatory compliance issues.

How well does your organization comply with U.S. regulatory requirements like 1099 reporting, sales and use tax, and OFAC? It is safe to say that few people would declare regulation as the favorite part of their job, but non-compliance can mean fines, penalties, and/or increased scrutiny from regulators. As the lead researcher for AP Now’s 2017 survey on regulatory compliance issues, I saw firsthand that there is room for improvement. As a payment professional, you can help your organization step up its efforts. Following are tidbits from AP Now’s survey results, including where Commercial Cards fit into the regulatory picture.

1099 Reporting

Commercial Cards are a win here. To reduce the burden of federal 1099 reporting for domestic payments, expand the usage of Commercial Cards—regular cards and/or electronic payables (e.g., Virtual Cards). As a reminder, the regulatory responsibility shifted several years ago, adding to the benefits of card usage. As stated within www.irs.gov, “Under section 6050W of the Internal Revenue Code, payment settlement entities (merchant acquiring entities and third party settlement organizations) must report payment card and third party network transactions. This reporting requirement began in early 2012 for payment card and third party network transactions that occurred in 2011.”

For your reportable non-card payments, do what you can to minimize the pain. Per the AP Now survey results:

  • Among organizations that do TIN matching, 81% receive fewer than 10 B-Notices annually.
  • While about half of respondents’ organizations use the IRS TIN matching system at some point, only 14% follow the best practice of doing so throughout the year when new vendors are added and in conjunction with annual reporting.

Sales and Use Tax

Some survey respondents volunteered that their biggest problem related to tax compliance is card payments. One person commented that, with P-Cards, it is difficult to determine what is being purchased and where it will be used. Further, survey results indicate that about one-fifth of organizations generally disregard or exclude card payments from their use tax accrual process.

Lack of an effective accrual process puts your organization at risk of a use tax assessment that could reach or exceed $1M; see the related blog post by Recharged Education, including tips for improving your approach. Begin by confirming who is responsible for tax compliance for your card program. Do not assume that the tax group is handling it.

OFAC

The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) maintains the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons list (“SDN list”), which people also refer to generically as the OFAC list. It reflects individuals, companies, groups, etc. for which assets are blocked, and U.S. persons and companies are generally prohibited from dealing with them. For OFAC resources, visit the website at: https://www.treasury.gov/about/organizational-structure/offices/Pages/Office-of-Foreign-Assets-Control.aspx

Per the survey results, 40% of organizations check the list, which is promising. Awareness appears to be growing. The best practice is to check the list for each new vendor, regardless of payment method, and keep related records of your efforts. Has your organization assigned this responsibility to a specific department? 

Final Thoughts

As recommended in the AP Now report of survey results, combatting the challenges begins with actively pursuing channels to better understand the regulatory requirements and determining where your organization falls short. From there, incorporating knowledge of the requirements into best practices is the right path. This includes:

  • Assigning related responsibilities
  • Providing training
  • Updating policies and procedures as needed
  • Exploring technology options when warranted

Survey Results

To purchase the complete survey results, visit the AP Now website: http://www.ap-now.com/products/item100.cfm.


About the Author

Blog post author Lynn Larson, CPCP, is the founder of Recharged Education. With more than 15 years of Commercial Card experience, her mission is to make industry education readily accessible to all. Learn more

Subscribe to the Blog

Receive notice of new blog posts.

Two Supreme Court decisions this week.

The U.S. Supreme Court made two key decisions this week. One pertains to litigation involving merchants, card networks and banks. The other pertains to New York’s state law prohibiting merchants from adding a surcharge to credit card payments. 

First, on March 27, 2017, the Court declined to hear a bid by merchants to essentially resurrect the lawsuit settlement, finalized in 2013, involving Mastercard, Visa, and some banks. The settlement was later negated (in June 2016) by the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals, based on their perspective that merchants were not properly represented.

To summarize this saga:

  • Initial settlement of interchange lawsuit in 2012; as one result, Mastercard and Visa began to allow surcharging in the United States in January 2013 (as long as merchants adhered to specific rules)

  • Final approval of the settlement at the end of 2013

  • Merchants appealed; the appeal ruling in 2016 favored merchants, negating the settlement

  • In 2017, U.S. Supreme Court declines to get involved

Back to square one. We can expect ongoing litigation between merchants and card networks related to card acceptance fees. 

Next, on March 29, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court concluded New York’s no surcharge law regulates speech because it regulates the communication of prices. They remanded the Court of Appeals to analyze NY’s law as a speech regulation and determine whether it is unconstitutional, violating the First Amendment.

For more information, visit the Surcharge News webpage.


About the Author

Blog post author Lynn Larson, CPCP, is the founder of Recharged Education. With more than 15 years of Commercial Card experience, her mission is to make industry education readily accessible to all. Learn more

Subscribe to the Blog

Receive notice of new blog posts.

Who is your executive champion?

Beyond the initial P-Card program implementation, which was many years or even decades ago for most organizations, the role of an executive champion evolves. As a program manager or administrator (PM/PA), are you actively engaging your champion to help enhance their role and prevent their support from waning? We know that executives have the power to make or break a card program, so keeping them involved is a must. Following is a look at what you can do, as well as examples of what the executive champion can do.

Know Your Executive

You might be working with the same executive who approved the original program or someone new. Either way, consider the following.

  • What is their current view of the program? 
  • Which aspects are most important to them?
  • What do they expect of you?
  • How often do they want to see a report of program progress?
  • How do they want to receive program updates?
  • Do they prefer details or summaries? Graphs can be a great way to provide at-a-glance information.

Inform Your Executive

Having a better understanding of your executive allows you to tailor your communications accordingly. Following are ways to keep him or her informed. In addition, occasionally verify if what you are providing is valuable and, if not, what you can do differently.

  • Report program status; for example, progress toward goals, comparisons to previous years, and missed opportunities (see also information on metrics).
  • Share P-Card best practices and how your organization compares.
  • Outline any issues and propose solutions.
  • Make suggestions regarding program improvement and/or expansion possibilities.

During my time as a P-Card program manager, I identified how my organization had surpassed goals and outgrown the initial revenue share grid. I reported as such to the executive champion and, together, we renegotiated the contract with our card provider.

The Ongoing Role of a Champion

An executive champion can directly execute and/or delegate the following actions. 

  1. Enforce cardholder and manager accountability, and demonstrate corrective action consistency across job levels.  
  2. Support training initiatives; for example, email participants about the importance of training and attend in-person sessions (if offered) from time to time.
  3. Promote the program; for example, encourage “lunch and learn” sessions, make P-Cards a topic at budget meetings, and introduce the P-Card program at new hire training.
  4. Routinely review program status; subsequently, this could mean asking questions of the PM/PA and participating in calls/meetings with the card provider.  
  5. Help steer the program; for example, endorse policy changes to expand card usage.

An active executive champion can take a program to the next level.

Related Blog Post

Does program buy-in seem out of reach?


About the Author

Blog post author Lynn Larson, CPCP, is the founder of Recharged Education. With more than 15 years of Commercial Card experience, her mission is to make industry education readily accessible to all. Learn more

Subscribe to the Blog

Receive notice of new blog posts.