Cards are king for one city.

This fact is astounding: The City of Lenexa (Kansas) uses traditional P-Cards for more than 70% of its business-to-business (B2B) payments. How have they done it? What are their future plans? My interview with Dana Simms, Senior Accountant, follows. It demonstrates the value of organization-wide support, patience, and perseverance. 

Keys to Success

Q: To what do you attribute such great success?

A: One, the support of our management team. Without their support and backing, there would be no motivation among city staff to use Purchasing Cards. Two, employees appreciate the ability to make purchases they need when needed. Employees do not want to process a requisition or a check request and wait two days to maybe two weeks for a check to make the purchase. Three, the implementation of select ghost accounts. We have established ghost accounts for Verizon, the Information Technology department, and the Finance department. These two departments can pay invoices on a Purchasing Card that may be over the normal card limits, which are $2,500 per transaction and $5,000 per month.

Editorial note: Some end-user organizations, like the City of Lenexa, have proven that traditional ghost accounts work for them. These accounts, with limits that refresh each month/cycle, function like a regular P-Card. However, common drawbacks include lack of dispute rights and difficulty identifying or enforcing accountability since the account is not issued to a particular employee. An organization should discuss the pros and cons of ghost accounts with its card provider.

Q: What do you think are unique characteristics of Lenexa (regarding your card program) compared to other cities or even other organizations?

A: Our management team and governing body have always been progressive with their thinking and actions.  If something makes sense, saving time and money, then they are eager to take advantage of the opportunity.

Early Challenges

Q: What were some of your biggest challenges to overcome to get Lenexa to where it is at today?

A: The biggest challenge was getting the employees to use their cards at the point of purchase. It was easier for them to place a purchase on a house account and/or have the vendor invoice the City. The first step was to close all house accounts. Then, if an invoice was entered for payment, we contacted the employee (purchaser) and asked them to place it on their purchasing card. It only took a few times of returning invoices to employees for them to realize the payment process was easier via card.

Editorial note: Access a previous blog post that addresses the importance of ensuring cards are easy to use and three key elements to assess in this quest.

With the right support, cards can emerge as the focal piece of your payment strategy.

With the right support, cards can emerge as the focal piece of your payment strategy.

Current Challenges

Q: What are your biggest card program challenges now?

A: Two things, both of which pertain to vendors and card acceptance. Some vendors want to add a surcharge to accept purchasing cards. Kansas has a “no surcharges” law, but there really are not any enforcement processes in place. If a vendor applies a surcharge, we attempt to contact them. Another challenge is the card acceptance fee. Some vendors are willing to absorb the fees on small-dollar items, but not on bigger items such as construction or equipment/vehicles.

Editorial note: The merchant ID and physical business address for that ID determines whether surcharging is permissible. In other words, a merchant abides by the laws in the merchant’s state, regardless of the laws in other states to which the merchant ships goods or in which it provides services. See more on surcharging...

Current/Future Plans

Q: Where does Lenexa plan to go from here? Perhaps you just want to maintain your current level.

A: We would like to continue to grow the program. Employee and vendor education, along with monitoring purchases, are big factors in being able to do this.

Final Thoughts

The City of Lenexa has the right idea. When you have achieved a high level of card success, do not simply stop. Continue to look for new opportunities.

Another thing to focus on is program management and the elements that could be improved. What are your pain points? Could your policies and procedures be revitalized? Could you expand or refine the training program? What about purchase-to-pay efficiencies?

If your organization would like assistance with any program improvement endeavors, submit a contact form to learn how Recharged Education can help. 

 


About the Author

Blog post author Lynn Larson, CPCP, is the founder of Recharged Education. With more than 15 years of Commercial Card experience, her mission is to make industry education readily accessible to all. Learn more

Subscribe to the Blog

Receive notice of new blog posts.

External fraud can freeze card use.

According to AP Now’s 2016 Payment Fraud Survey, 53% of organizations put the freeze on Commercial Cards by limiting or restricting usage due to concerns about external fraud. The frequency at which cards are replaced as a result of a compromise, data breach, or fraud can feed these concerns. As discussed below, the majority of organizations have had cards replaced in the past 12 months. What can you do internally to help reduce external card fraud? Recharged Education, in support of International Fraud Awareness Week this week, shares tips. Read on to learn more. 

Replacement Cards

In recent years, there have been several high-profile cases of data breaches or compromises involving big box stores and others. A common proactive response by providers is cancelling at-risk cards and issuing replacement cards. The graph below from AP Now’s 2016 Payment Fraud Survey (www.ap-now.com) shows the percentage of cards replaced at each respondent’s organization in the past 12 months. (The remaining 16%, not represented in the graph, were not sure about the percentage.)    

Having a card replaced can be inconvenient, especially if the old card was tied to automatic/recurring charges, but it serves as a protection. The process cost of dealing with card closure and reissuance should be minimal compared to the process savings and efficiencies achievable through card usage. You can do the math to verify this assumption, beginning with identifying the tasks associated with replacement cards (e.g., disposal of old card, activation of new card, notification to applicable vendors, etc.). If you need assistance with calculating the process cost, please submit a contact form.

Of course, replacing 2% of cards in a program with 200 cards is quite different than replacing 2% in a 2,000-card program. Regardless of program size, an organization should do what it can to help minimize external fraud.

Before your organization makes the drastic decision to put the freeze on card use, consider the many protective controls and the value of card payments.

Before your organization makes the drastic decision to put the freeze on card use, consider the many protective controls and the value of card payments.

Action Items

In addition to what the industry is collectively doing to protect card payments (e.g., EMV/chip cards, additional technology like biometrics, fraud monitoring, etc.), an end-user organization needs to be diligent.

  • Stress to cardholders the importance of their role in fighting external fraud.
  • Mandate training pertaining to card security; see related blog post.
  • Enforce cardholder review of their transactions at least monthly.
  • Ask cardholders to sign up with the card provider to receive text alerts about suspicious activity.
  • Ensure card policies and procedures instruct cardholders on what to do if they suspect fraud.
  • Audit key aspects of card security. For example, simulate a phishing phone call and see how a cardholder responds. 
  • Stay informed on fraud and emerging threats.  
  • Within supplier contracts, include language about compliance with the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS).

International Fraud Awareness Week

November 13–19, 2016

Learn more about this week, including downloading 5 fraud tips every business leader should act on and viewing a special promotion by Recharged Education on its P-Card Risk Assessment Template.  


About the Author

Blog post author Lynn Larson, CPCP, is the founder of Recharged Education. With more than 15 years of Commercial Card experience, her mission is to make industry education readily accessible to all. Learn more

Subscribe to the Blog

Receive notice of new blog posts.

Hang on or let go? When you are outvoted.

What does an organization’s payment strategy have in common with the current U.S. presidential election and, earlier, the UK vote on whether to leave the European Union? In the simplest terms, there are winner and losers. One side gets what they want. The other side has to figure out how to react. We have all been part of the latter group at some point in our careers. Card program buy-in—something I have written about before (see related blog post)—is a prime example of what can polarize an organization. What if you have exhausted all avenues to improving program buy-in and nothing has worked? What do you do? Following are four possible reactions. Only one can benefit your career, so read on to learn what it is and what actions go along with it.

When You Do Not Get Your Way

You believe card payments are a no-brainer. Management does not agree or they have different priorities, even though you have tried everything to convince them otherwise. Common reactions include becoming:

  1. Hostile: U.S. news headlines have indicated some Trump supporters plan to revolt if Clinton wins the election. Such strong reactions generally do not lead to anything good. On the job, hostility could mean threatening to quit or roadblock any initiative for which you do not agree.
  2. Disinterested: You lose motivation. Your productivity drops. Sloppiness can set in. This reaction, like hostility, often means poor job performance reviews and a hit to your reputation.  
  3. Annoying: Perseverance is one thing. Being annoying is another. Management could perceive you as difficult when you push too hard. As a passionate card program manager, I admit to being in this category a time or two. The good news is, passion can transition to #4.
  4. Resilient: This is what will benefit your career. You are defeated, but not beaten down. You resolve to make the best of a situation. New Britain Prime Minister Theresa May did not support Brexit, but she is trying to support the people (the “winners” of the vote) and move the country forward. 
Resiliency often requires a combination of hanging on while also letting go. Success is determined by knowing what to put in each category.

Resiliency often requires a combination of hanging on while also letting go. Success is determined by knowing what to put in each category.

Resilient Actions: What You Can Do

Besides looking for a new job, you can still shine in your current one:

  • Ensure you know the goals of your organization or department and determine how you can contribute, which might require a conversation with your manager.
  • Expand your knowledge, whether it is Commercial Cards or a related topic like eInvoicing.
  • Engage with your card provider to acquire more best practices and tips for strengthening your program within the realm of your control.
  • Provide excellent customer service to cardholders.
  • Address any control gaps.

Finally, do not completely abandon your program buy-in efforts. A future change in management can reignite organization interest in card payments. If/when this happens, be ready with actions to expand the card program.


About the Author

Blog post author Lynn Larson, CPCP, is the founder of Recharged Education. With more than 15 years of Commercial Card experience, her mission is to make industry education readily accessible to all. Learn more

Subscribe to the Blog

Receive notice of new blog posts.